Account Links: Cart | Your Account

Skip to content

Rate this page del.icio.us  Digg slashdot StumbleUpon

EFF Asks Court to Limit What Is Patentable

by T. Colin Dodd

EFF Asks Court to Limit What Is Patentable | Electronic Frontier Foundation

In re Bilski is an appellate court case that provides an opportunity to eliminate business method patents and curtail efforts to claim monopolies on basic human skills, behaviors, and interactions. Bilski is challenging the rejection of his application for a patent on a method of managing the risk of bad weather through commodities trading. EFF submitted an amicus brief (in conjunction with The Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic at UC Berkeley Law, Public Knowledge, and Consumers Union) supporting the rejection of Bilski’s patent application and setting forth a framework for determining patentable subject matter that focuses on the use of technology in the claimed invention.

Leave a reply

Subscribe


more RSS feeds

Now playing


Quicktime | Real
Real Stream | Ogg Theora

Recent postings

Harmonization of patent law? That’s a new one.

MIT OpenCourseWare

Internet Archive defeats ‘National Security Letter,’ Makes it public

Open Source Initiative Responds to OLPC article.

Sigh.

Posts by category

Monthly archives

More info

Leadership
Public policy

Red Hat Press
Red Hat Magazine
Dev Fu
Red Hat People

Search our archives

Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS). Truth Happens is powered by Lyceum and WordPress.


Copyright © 2007 Red Hat, Inc. All rights reserved.
Valid XHTML : Privacy Policy : Terms of Use : Patent promise : Company : Contact